What’s On Your Plate?
In
Milan, where I live, lunch consists in a first course (usually pasta or rice,
sometimes the much-hated soup), a second plate of meat or fish, a side dish of
vegetables and finlly fruit or dessert.
In a dish in Paris we could easily find fish, spinach, potatoes, cheese and bread.
If we were children in Bangkok we could see ourselves served with pork in sweet and
sour sauce, rice and a pudding wrapped in banana leaves.
What about
India? On 15 August 1995 the NP – NSPE (National Programme of Nutritional
Support to Primary Education) was launched. The programthen led, in 2001, to
the creation of the MDMS (Mid Day Meal Scheme).Over the years the scheme has undergone
some changes and modifications, which led to the current shape of the program,
renamed the National Program of Mid Day Meal Scheme: extended to all areas of
the territory, with a summer extension in those severley affected by drought,
provides for a quantity of food equal to 450 calories and 12 grams of protein
per day for at least 200 days a year; all students up to 8th class in the
primary school benefit from the program, in every Government school or
subsidized school(asreported on the Department of School Education&Literacy
web page).
So,
what does any Indian student eat? Rice, lentils, roti, fruit and milk once a
week. What about proteins? What about eggs?
What’sbad?
Although
some improvements have been ascertained with the introduction of the program,
as reported on the official page of the Mid Day Meal Scheme in the Findings of Research studies, cases of
poor quality in the food served in the schools and malnutrition among children
are constantly reported.
This
August, a video in which about 100 students were recorded eating roti and salt at
lunch, still inside the MDMS, became viral. The scandal lead to the immediate
suspension of the teachers and the principal of the school under investigation,
and to an official appeal from the National Commission for Human Rights to the
Government of Uttar Pradesh: the selected commission then r equested a full
report on the matter. However, as reported by the weekly journal The Week,the
Government ofUttar Pradesh was already aware of serious cuts within the
program. A study conducted on 40 schools in 2016 by GIDS (Giri Institute of
Development Studies in Lucknow) has highlighted how“not all school had kitchen sheds
due to lack of space and funds; […]. Regarding the availability of food
supplies […] of the 40 schools in the study, only 26 had supplies worth a
month. On the quality parameter, three in 10 schools described the food as of
“average” quality”. The quantity of the meal was also reported to be
insufficient […]. […] lack of plates at schools because of which children had to
get utensils from home […].”
Another more recent report by the MHRD (Union Ministry of Human Resource
Development), dating back to March 2017, found that around 63% of schools still
use firewood to cook meals instead of the healthier and greener LPG.
If
from the health point of view the risks are clear and obvious, from a social
point of view the situation cannot be considered any better: the program has failed
to achieve one of its main goals, to improve the number of enrollments to
primary school. Indeed, the latest report drafted by CAG (Controller and
General Auditor of India) shows how the schools in which the scheme is being
put in place record a decline in the registrations in the last five years (from
146.9 million in 2009/2010 to 138.7 million in 2013/2014, as reported by the
DownToEarth website).
What’snext?
Given
what has been said so far, the need to make changes in the program, or at least
to follow it as it was actually designed became increasingly obvious. In
particular, deficiencies have been highlights in the amount of food available
for meals in schools, as well as its poor quality (some times even worms have been
found in children’s dishes).
What
would then be necessary to do? First of all, it is clear and evident the
importance of increasing the quantity of food served (a 7-8 year old child needs
about 1500-1700 kcal per day). An improvement in the quality of food would be
of fundamental importance, establishing a chain of controls that can guarantee at
least the minimum requirements.
These
are us two of the changes that must necessarily be implemented, in the hope that
one step at a time India will achieve what the program was created for.
Martina Pignatelli
International Cooperation &Development Student
Italy
Sources:
o
Department
of School Education&Literacy, “Mid-Day MealScheme”
o
The
Week, “UP govtwasaware of severe shortcomings of mid-day mealscheme”
o
The
Indian Express, “Report on Mid-day MealScheme: 63 per centschoolsstill use
firewood for cooking”
Down
To Earth, “Mid-day mealhasfailed to attractchildren to government schools, says
CAG audit
Your kind support will help to make our girls more #stronger #smarter & #inspiring
What about
India? On 15 August 1995 the NP – NSPE (National Programme of Nutritional
Support to Primary Education) was launched. The programthen led, in 2001, to
the creation of the MDMS (Mid Day Meal Scheme).Over the years the scheme has undergone
some changes and modifications, which led to the current shape of the program,
renamed the National Program of Mid Day Meal Scheme: extended to all areas of
the territory, with a summer extension in those severley affected by drought,
provides for a quantity of food equal to 450 calories and 12 grams of protein
per day for at least 200 days a year; all students up to 8th class in the
primary school benefit from the program, in every Government school or
subsidized school(asreported on the Department of School Education&Literacy
web page).
It,
therefore, becom esessential for every nation and every society to nurture a child’s
development both mentally and physically.It is rightly said that “Charity
begins at home”. Therefore, it is crucial that we ensure the mental and
physical well-being of our children.
Working on
Jal Shakti ministry’s nation-wide programme “Jal Shakti Abhiyan”, the ministry
of housing and urban affairs, which is the nodal agency for urban renewal, has
asked all urban local bodies to frame a water conservation programme. The
thrust areas specified under the ministry’s programme include rainwater
harvesting, reuse of treated waste water, rejuvenation of water bodies and
plantation. Every urban local body has been asked to first constitute a
rainwater harvesting cell which would would monitor ground water extraction,
water harvesting potential of the city and oversee projects on rainwater
harvesting.
.jpg)
