A short documentary on the dowry system in india

Despite being illegal in India, dowry continues to affect thousands of families, contributing to financial stress, gender discrimination, domestic violence, and serious mental health challenges.

In this short documentary, HEEALS explores why dowry remains a critical social issue and why awareness, education, and community action are essential to ending this harmful practice. Through our school and community workshops, we encourage meaningful conversations about healthy relationships, consent, gender equality, mental well-being, and the importance of marriages built on mutual respect rather than financial expectations. Every individual deserves a life free from discrimination and violence. Together, we can create communities where marriages are founded on love, equality, dignity, and shared responsibility. If this documentary inspires you, please Like, Share, and Subscribe to support our mission of promoting health, education, gender equality, mental health, and human rights. Together, let's end dowry and build a future where every marriage begins with respect—not demands.

Is Democracy Truly Working in India?

 

Is Democracy Truly Working in India? A Nation Must Have the Courage to Ask Difficult Questions

"The true test of a democracy is not how loudly the government speaks, but how sincerely it listens."

India proudly calls itself the world's largest democracy. We celebrate our Constitution, our elections, our Parliament, and our freedom. But democracy is much more than voting once every five years. Genuine democracy is a continuous conversation between the people and those elected to serve them.

The Constitution begins with three powerful words: "We, the People." It does not begin with "We, the Government." This simple phrase reminds us that the government derives its authority from the people, not the other way around.

A healthy democracy welcomes criticism. It listens to students, farmers, workers, tribal communities, journalists, teachers, doctors, and ordinary citizens. It does not view every disagreement as opposition. Instead, it asks a simple question: "How can we do better?"

Today, many young Indians are asking difficult questions about education, employment, healthcare, justice, and equality. These questions should not be dismissed. They deserve honest answers.

The Voice of Students

Students are the future of every nation, yet many young people today feel unheard.

In recent years, concerns over examination management, allegations of paper leaks in some competitive examinations, delays in recruitment, and uncertainty surrounding careers have caused frustration among students. For many families, years of preparation and financial sacrifice depend on these examinations.

The emotional cost is enormous. Mental health experts have repeatedly warned that academic pressure, uncertainty, and unemployment contribute to anxiety, depression, and, in tragic cases, student suicides.

Every student who loses hope is not merely an individual tragedy—it is a national failure.

Instead of allowing distrust to grow, governments must strengthen examination security, improve transparency, provide timely recruitment, expand mental health support, and communicate clearly with students.

Democracy Means Listening

The Indian Constitution guarantees citizens the freedom to express their opinions and assemble peacefully.

Peaceful protests are not threats to democracy—they are part of democracy.

Throughout India's freedom movement, students played an extraordinary role. Young people marched, protested, debated, and sacrificed their futures to build an independent nation. Their courage strengthened democracy.

Today, when students peacefully raise concerns about education, employment, or public policy, governments should engage with them through dialogue.

Public authorities also have a duty to maintain law and order, and protests should remain peaceful. At the same time, democratic societies are strongest when disagreements are addressed through conversation rather than confrontation.

Why Do Parents Still Prefer Private Schools?

India has made important investments in education, and many government schools have improved significantly. Dedicated teachers across the country work under challenging conditions.

Yet an uncomfortable question continues to be asked:

If every government school offered the same quality of education, infrastructure, laboratories, libraries, sports facilities, digital learning, and accountability as the best schools, would every family—including politicians, senior bureaucrats, and public officials—feel equally confident sending their children there?

This question reflects a larger aspiration: that every child, regardless of income or background, should receive an excellent education.

Quality public education should not be a privilege. It should be the foundation of an equal society.

Healthcare Should Not Depend on Wealth

India has world-class medical professionals and internationally respected hospitals. At the same time, millions of people continue to rely on public hospitals that face heavy patient loads and resource constraints.

Doctors and nurses often work tirelessly under immense pressure. Patients frequently experience long waiting times due to limited capacity.

A strong democracy ensures that quality healthcare is not determined by a family's income.

Investment in primary healthcare, district hospitals, preventive care, and public health infrastructure is not simply an economic decision—it is an investment in human dignity.

Justice Delayed

Another question concerns access to justice.

India's courts continue to face a very large backlog of pending cases. Delayed justice affects victims, businesses, families, and ordinary citizens alike.

Strengthening the judiciary through additional judges, modern technology, improved case management, and legal reforms is essential for ensuring that constitutional rights are meaningful in practice.

Development Must Include People

The recent protests surrounding the Ken–Betwa River Linking Project remind us that development can create both opportunities and difficult challenges.

Supporters argue the project may improve water security and regional development.

At the same time, many tribal communities and farmers have expressed concerns about displacement, rehabilitation, compensation, forests, and livelihoods. Peaceful protests, including Jal Satyagraha and hunger strikes, reflect these concerns.

Development and environmental protection should not be treated as opposing goals. Sustainable development requires meaningful consultation, fair compensation, effective rehabilitation, and respect for constitutional safeguards protecting vulnerable communities.

Economic growth becomes truly successful only when it improves lives without leaving communities behind.

Democracy Is More Than Elections

Winning elections provides the authority to govern.

It does not eliminate the responsibility to listen.

Strong democracies encourage independent institutions, a free press, constructive criticism, transparent decision-making, and citizen participation.

Governments are judged not only by the roads they build or the economic growth they achieve, but also by how they respond when citizens raise legitimate concerns.

Listening is not a weakness.

Listening is leadership.

The India Young People Dream Of

Young Indians are not asking for perfection.

They are asking for fairness.

They want secure examinations, quality education, accessible healthcare, timely justice, clean governance, employment opportunities, environmental protection, and equal opportunities regardless of income or social background.

These aspirations are not anti-government.

They are pro-Constitution.

They reflect the values of justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity that form the foundation of the Republic of India.

The Way Forward

Real democracy is not measured only by elections.

It is measured by whether:

• Every child receives quality education.

• Every patient receives dignified healthcare.

• Every citizen can peacefully express their views.

• Every tribal family is treated with justice and respect.

• Every young person has hope for the future.

• Every institution remains accountable.

• Every government remains willing to learn, improve, and listen.

India possesses extraordinary talent, remarkable resilience, and immense potential.

The next chapter of India's progress will not be written only through economic growth or technological advancement.

It will be written through the courage to ask difficult questions, the wisdom to listen carefully, and the collective determination to build a nation where development reaches every citizen—not only the privileged few.

Because in a true democracy, the government exists to serve the people, and the people should never have to struggle to be heard.

Rethinking International Volunteering

 

Rethinking International Volunteering: Should Universities Expect Grassroots NGOs in Developing Countries to Host International Volunteers Free of Charge?

By Gaurav Kashyap
Managing Director, HEEALS (Health Education Environment and Livelihood Society), India

 

International Volunteering Is Meant to Build Global Citizenship—Not Financial Burdens for Grassroots NGOs

Every year, universities across the United Kingdom and Europe encourage thousands of students to volunteer internationally. These experiences are promoted as opportunities to develop leadership, intercultural understanding, professional skills, and a deeper appreciation of global challenges while contributing to communities around the world.

It is a commendable objective.

However, there is a fundamental question that is rarely discussed:

Is it fair to expect grassroots NGOs in developing countries to provide free accommodation, food, transportation, supervision, and project management for international volunteers simply because they are "volunteers"?

Many universities have policies under which volunteer opportunities advertised through their careers or volunteering services are expected to be unpaid and, in many cases, only allow volunteers to be reimbursed for reasonable expenses rather than paying programme fees. These policies are understandable in their domestic context, where volunteering is often local and organizations may have access to public funding or established volunteer infrastructures.

But when these same expectations are applied to international volunteering in developing countries, they can unintentionally exclude the very grassroots organizations that are creating the greatest social impact.

---

The Reality of Grassroots NGOs

Across India, Nepal, Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Bangladesh, Cambodia, and many other developing nations, thousands of local NGOs work every day in communities facing poverty, poor sanitation, gender inequality, inadequate healthcare, climate vulnerability, and limited educational opportunities.

Unlike large international organizations, grassroots NGOs generally:

• operate with very limited budgets;
• rely on small donations and project-based grants;
• receive little unrestricted funding;
• employ small teams;
• prioritize spending on community programmes rather than administrative overhead.

These organizations are not businesses.

Nor are they wealthy institutions.

Their limited financial resources are dedicated to serving vulnerable communities.

 

Hosting International Volunteers Is Not Free

There is a widespread misconception that volunteers cost organizations nothing.

The reality is very different.

Hosting one international volunteer often requires:

• airport pickup and drop-off;
• safe accommodation;
• three daily meals;
• local transportation;
• orientation programmes;
• cultural briefings;
• project supervision;
• staff mentoring;
• administrative coordination;
• office facilities;
• field visits;
• emergency support;
• safeguarding measures;
• monitoring and evaluation.

Every volunteer requires planning, staff time, logistical support, and financial investment.

For many grassroots NGOs, these costs are substantial.

 

Who Should Bear These Costs?

This is perhaps the most important question.

Should a small community-based NGO in rural India, already struggling to fund education programmes for disadvantaged children, also finance the accommodation and meals of international volunteers arriving from some of the world's wealthiest economies?

Should organizations serving vulnerable communities divert funds intended for women, children, health programmes, or sanitation projects simply to ensure that volunteers pay nothing?

Most people would agree that this expectation is difficult to justify.

 

International Volunteers Also Benefit

Volunteering is often portrayed as an act of giving.

It certainly is.

But it is equally an opportunity for learning.

Students gain:

• international work experience;
• intercultural competence;
• practical field skills;
• research opportunities;
• professional development;
• academic credits in some programmes;
• leadership experience;
• enhanced employability.

For many graduates, international volunteering significantly strengthens their CV and opens future career opportunities.

This means volunteering is not a one-sided relationship.

It creates value for both the community and the volunteer.

Recognising this mutual benefit makes it reasonable for participants to contribute towards the actual costs of their stay.

 

Paying Universities Is Accepted—Why Not Supporting Grassroots NGOs?

Every year, students willingly invest significant sums in:

• university tuition;
• study abroad programmes;
• international field schools;
• exchange programmes;
• educational tours;
• language courses;
• professional training.

These expenses are accepted because students understand they are investing in their education and future.

Yet when a grassroots NGO requests a transparent contribution towards accommodation, meals, transportation, and supervision, the opportunity is sometimes viewed differently.

This creates an inconsistency.

Students may spend thousands of pounds on international education but are discouraged from contributing a modest amount that directly supports the organization hosting them.

 

Programme Fees Are Often Cost Recovery, Not Profit

Another misconception is that NGOs charging programme fees are operating commercially.

For most grassroots organizations, programme contributions simply cover:

• accommodation;
• meals;
• local transport;
• volunteer coordination;
• supervision;
• community activities;
• safety;
• administration.

In many cases, these contributions also help sustain community programmes that would otherwise struggle due to insufficient funding.

They are not profits.

They are operational necessities.

 

Universities Should Distinguish Between Commercial Voluntourism and Grassroots NGOs

Universities are right to protect students from exploitative practices.

Commercial "voluntourism" has rightly received criticism where organizations prioritize profit over community benefit.

However, there is a significant difference between commercial enterprises and registered grassroots NGOs that transparently explain their programme costs and demonstrate measurable social impact.

Treating both in the same way risks excluding genuine organizations that are creating meaningful change in underserved communities.

A more nuanced approach would better serve both students and communities.

 

Let Students Make Informed Choices

Universities exist to educate, empower, and encourage critical thinking.

Rather than deciding in advance which opportunities students may or may not consider based solely on programme fees, universities could provide transparent information and allow students to make informed decisions.

If an NGO clearly explains:

• what the programme involves;
• what costs are included;
• how the funds are used;
• how volunteers will be supported;
• the expected learning outcomes;

students should be trusted to decide whether the opportunity aligns with their goals and financial circumstances.

Transparency should be the standard—not automatic exclusion.

 

Supporting the Principle of Localization

The international development community increasingly emphasizes localization—recognizing that local organizations are best placed to understand community needs and deliver sustainable solutions.

Governments, donors, and international agencies frequently speak about strengthening local leadership and increasing direct support for community-based organizations.

Yet if university policies effectively prevent students from even seeing opportunities offered by grassroots NGOs because those organizations cannot subsidize volunteers, this unintentionally undermines the very principle of localization.

Supporting local organizations means recognising their realities—not expecting them to operate with the resources of international institutions.

 

A More Equitable Partnership Model

Instead of excluding organizations that request reasonable programme contributions, universities could adopt a more balanced approach.

Volunteer opportunities could be promoted provided that:

• organizations are legally registered;
• safeguarding standards are met;
• programme fees are transparent;
• costs reflect genuine operational expenses;
• learning outcomes are clearly defined.

Universities could also:

• offer bursaries or travel scholarships;
• encourage ethical international volunteering;
• educate students about the financial realities of grassroots organizations;
• build long-term partnerships with trusted NGOs.

Such an approach benefits everyone.

Students gain meaningful international experiences.

Communities continue receiving valuable support.

Grassroots organizations remain financially sustainable.

 

International Volunteering Should Be Based on Partnership, Not Charity

Perhaps the most important shift is philosophical.

International volunteering should not be viewed as wealthy countries "helping" poorer countries.

Instead, it should be understood as a partnership built on mutual learning, shared responsibility, and respect.

Grassroots NGOs provide knowledge, experience, community trust, and opportunities for learning that cannot be replicated in a classroom.

International volunteers bring enthusiasm, skills, fresh perspectives, and intercultural exchange.

Both sides contribute.

Both sides benefit.

Therefore, both sides should share responsibility for making these programmes sustainable.

 

Conclusion

International volunteering has enormous potential to promote global citizenship, empathy, and sustainable development.

But for this potential to be realised, policies must reflect the realities of those working closest to vulnerable communities.

Grassroots NGOs in developing countries are not luxury institutions.

They are mission-driven organizations operating with limited resources while addressing some of the world's most pressing social and environmental challenges.

Expecting them to finance accommodation, meals, transportation, supervision, and programme management for international volunteers is often unrealistic and inequitable.

Universities should continue protecting students from exploitation—but they should also recognise the legitimate costs faced by ethical, community-based organizations.

Rather than excluding opportunities that involve reasonable programme contributions, universities should promote transparency, informed choice, and equitable partnerships.

International volunteering should empower both students and host communities. Achieving that goal requires moving beyond the assumption that every volunteer placement must be free for participants and instead embracing a model based on shared responsibility, mutual respect, and sustainable collaboration.

 

Author's Note

This article is not an argument against unpaid volunteering or student protection policies. Rather, it is a call to recognize the financial realities faced by grassroots organizations in low- and middle-income countries. Ethical international volunteering depends on transparency, accountability, and fairness for all stakeholders—including the local organizations that make these transformative experiences possible.

Bullying in India: Understanding a Hidden Crisis

 

Bullying in India: Understanding a Hidden Crisis

Bullying is a significant but often underreported problem in India, affecting the well-being, education, and mental health of many children and adolescents. Research conducted across different regions of the country suggests that approximately one-third of school students experience some form of bullying, although reported prevalence varies depending on the study, age group, and location.

Bullying can occur in schools, colleges, online platforms, neighborhoods, and other social settings. It commonly includes verbal abuse, physical aggression, social exclusion, intimidation, spreading rumors, and cyberbullying.

Common Forms of Bullying

• Verbal Bullying: Name-calling, teasing, mocking, insults, and spreading rumors are among the most commonly reported forms of bullying in Indian schools.
• Physical Bullying: Hitting, pushing, kicking, damaging belongings, or other forms of physical aggression.
• Social or Relational Bullying: Deliberately excluding someone from groups, friendships, or activities, or encouraging others to isolate them.
• Cyberbullying: Harassment, threats, impersonation, or sharing harmful content through social media, messaging apps, gaming platforms, or other digital spaces.

Factors That Contribute to Bullying

Bullying is influenced by multiple social, psychological, and environmental factors rather than a single cause. Some contributing factors include:

• Intense academic competition and pressure to perform.
• Lack of social-emotional learning and conflict-resolution education.
• Poor school climate and inadequate supervision.
• Discrimination based on appearance, gender, disability, caste, religion, language, socioeconomic background, or other personal characteristics.
• Exposure to violence or aggressive behavior at home, in school, or through media.
• Limited awareness among students, parents, and educators about recognizing and responding to bullying.

The Role of Schools

Research indicates that students are more likely to report bullying when schools have supportive teachers, clear anti-bullying policies, and effective reporting mechanisms. Creating a safe and inclusive school environment requires:

• Promoting respect, empathy, and inclusion.
• Encouraging students to report bullying without fear of retaliation.
• Training teachers to identify and respond appropriately to bullying.
• Providing counseling and mental health support for both victims and those exhibiting bullying behavior.
• Engaging parents and communities in prevention efforts.

Legal and Policy Framework in India

India does not currently have a single comprehensive national anti-bullying law specifically for primary and secondary schools.

However, students are protected through various constitutional provisions, child protection laws, educational guidelines, and criminal laws where bullying involves offences such as assault, criminal intimidation, sexual harassment, stalking, or other forms of abuse.

In higher educational institutions, anti-ragging regulations issued by the University Grants Commission (UGC) require colleges and universities to prevent, monitor, and take action against ragging.

Cyberbullying and online harassment may be addressed under the Information Technology Act, 2000, along with applicable provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, depending on the nature of the offence.

Moving Forward

Preventing bullying requires a whole-school and community approach. Students, teachers, parents, school leaders, policymakers, and communities all play an important role in creating environments where every child feels safe, respected, and valued. Building empathy, encouraging open communication, strengthening mental health support, and implementing effective prevention programs are essential steps toward reducing bullying and promoting healthy learning environments.