Monday, 26 May 2025

They call us "grassroots," but we carry the weight of change.

They call us "grassroots," but we carry the weight of change.

India’s most vulnerable communities are counting on small, local NGOs like HEEALS—yet we remain invisible to the CSR lens. 




At HEEALS, we are not just an NGO—we are a movement rooted in the streets, slums, and schools of India. Our mission is clear: to build a vibrant civil society that thrives in health, education, environment, and livelihood. Since 2010, we’ve been the quiet force behind change—delivering menstrual hygiene education, water and sanitation projects, mental health support, and skill-building programs across rural and underserved regions.
Yet, despite our unwavering dedication and community presence, we are systematically excluded from mainstream CSR funding. Here's the hidden reality:
The Facts CSR Often Overlooks:
• Over 90% of India’s 3.4 million NGOs are grassroots-level, but less than 10% receive any form of structured CSR funding.
• Large NGOs, often headquartered in metros, absorb more than 80% of corporate CSR budgets.
• Section 135 of the Companies Act mandates CSR, but lacks clear mechanisms to prioritize small, high-impact NGOs.
• Part IV of the Indian Constitution highlights the importance of equitable development, but funding rarely reaches the organizations closest to the need.
We serve the most marginalized—yet we're last in line for support.
Why Grassroots NGOs Matter:
Grassroots NGOs like HEEALS are deeply embedded in the communities they serve. We:
• Understand cultural barriers first-hand (e.g., menstrual stigma, water taboos)
• Deliver low-cost, high-impact programs
• Can scale faster in rural pockets where large organizations often don’t operate
• Are trusted by the communities—something no MOU can manufacture
The Change We Need:
We urge the government to revise CSR guidelines to mandate a minimum allocation for grassroots NGOs. This will:
• Ensure fairer access to development funds
• Promote bottom-up innovation
• Align India’s CSR ecosystem with true sustainable development goals
We also invite CSR bodies, foundations, and philanthropists to partner with us. Your support will not just fund a project—it will fuel a movement that touches lives where it matters most.



Get involved: communications@heeals.org | WhatsApp: +91-7982316660
www.heeals.org | 
Instagram: @heealsindia.

Thursday, 15 May 2025

Handwashing in India: A Lifesaving Habit Still Struggling for Acceptance

 

Handwashing in India: A Lifesaving Habit Still Struggling for Acceptance

Introduction

Handwashing with soap is one of the simplest, most cost-effective ways to prevent the spread of diseases—yet in India, this basic hygiene practice remains far from universal. Despite awareness campaigns and public health drives, the actual practice of handwashing, especially with soap, is alarmingly inconsistent. This gap between awareness and action unveils deeper issues—social, infrastructural, and systemic—that continue to cost lives every day.


Why Handwashing Matters

According to UNICEF, proper handwashing can reduce:

  • Diarrheal diseases by up to 47%
  • Respiratory infections by 16%
  • Neonatal infections (when caregivers practice hand hygiene) by 40%

These numbers are especially critical in India, where millions suffer annually from preventable infections—many due to poor hygiene practices.


The Reality on the Ground: Hidden Facts

1. Awareness Is Not the Same as Practice

While awareness of handwashing has increased due to government campaigns like Swachh Bharat Abhiyan and Jal Jeevan Mission, actual behavior change remains limited. A 2020 study by the WaterAid India and the RICE Institute revealed:

  • Only 60% of rural households had a designated place for handwashing.
  • Fewer than 50% used soap consistently after toilet use.
  • Handwashing before meals—even in urban areas—was often neglected.

2. Soap Is a Luxury for Many

For families living below the poverty line, especially in rural areas and urban slums, soap competes with food and fuel. A bar of soap is seen as a "non-essential item"—reserved for bathing or washing clothes, not necessarily for hand hygiene.

3. Schools and Public Places Lack Facilities

Despite policies that mandate functional handwashing stations in schools:

  • Nearly 40% of government schools either don't have soap or lack running water.
  • In many rural schools, children share a single bucket of water for washing, which defeats the purpose of hygiene altogether.
  • Public toilets and hospitals—ironically places that should emphasize hygiene—often lack soap dispensers and clean water supply.

4. Gender Inequality in Hygiene

Women and girls are disproportionately affected by poor hygiene infrastructure:

  • During menstruation, lack of clean water and soap increases infection risks.
  • Caregivers (mostly women) without access to proper hygiene can unknowingly transmit pathogens to newborns and infants.

Barriers to Handwashing in India

a. Cultural Beliefs and Habits

In some regions, traditional practices like rinsing with water alone are seen as sufficient. Soap is viewed as necessary only when "visible dirt" is present, not for killing germs.

b. Water Scarcity

In drought-prone areas or water-stressed urban neighborhoods, water is rationed, and handwashing is considered wasteful.

c. Inconsistent Messaging

Government and NGO campaigns often focus on toilet construction and sanitation, but hygiene education—including handwashing—is treated as secondary or optional.


The COVID-19 Wake-Up Call—But Was It Enough?

The COVID-19 pandemic brought global attention to hand hygiene, leading to a short-term spike in awareness and practice. However, post-pandemic surveys showed a gradual decline as fear subsided and water/soap access remained erratic.

Even in hospitals, compliance with hand hygiene protocols dropped back to pre-pandemic levels due to overcrowding, underfunding, and staff fatigue.


Steps Forward: What Needs to Change

1. Infrastructure First

  • Ensure every school, hospital, and public place has functional handwashing stations with running water and soap.
  • Invest in low-cost, water-saving handwash technology in water-scarce areas.

2. Behavior Change Campaigns

  • Use local influencers, community health workers, and school programs to demystify hand hygiene.
  • Link handwashing with pride, care, and community well-being, not just personal health.

3. Regulatory Oversight

  • Mandate soap and water availability in all public-funded buildings and services.
  • Penalize institutions that do not meet hygiene standards.

4. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Involvement

  • Encourage companies to distribute free or subsidized soap in rural and low-income areas.
  • Collaborate with NGOs to maintain hygiene infrastructure beyond one-time installations.

A Fight for Dignity and Survival

Handwashing is not just a health issue—it is about dignity, equality, and human rights. In a country where 500,000 children die each year from diarrheal diseases, most of them preventable through simple hygiene, handwashing becomes a symbol of India's development priorities. Bridging the gap between knowledge and practice is not a matter of building awareness alone—it requires systemic changecommunity empowerment, and the political will to invest in the health of the poorest. Until then, millions will continue to pay the price for a habit that costs next to nothing—but saves lives.

 

Tuesday, 13 May 2025

Why Manual scavenging remains a pressing issue in India?


 

Where do you think he's going?
He's stepping into a septic tank—a chamber filled with toxic gases and deadly chemicals that can take a life in seconds.
And yet, he goes in with no protective suit, no helmet, and no safety gear.
The mask he wears? Merely symbolic. It offers no real protection.
Why does the system continue to fail him?
Why the most basic safety measures are still a distant dream for those doing the most dangerous work?

Manual scavenging remains a pressing issue in India, despite legal prohibitions and various government initiatives aimed at its eradication.
📊 The Hidden Truth: Data vs. Reality
• Underreported Figures: While the government claims that manual scavenging has been eradicated, data indicates otherwise. Between 2019 and 2023, 377 individuals died due to hazardous cleaning of sewers and septic tanks. Since 1993, over 1,200 such deaths have been reported, with Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh, and Delhi accounting for the highest numbers .(Business Standard, The Tribune)
• Caste-Based Discrimination: Approximately 97% of manual scavengers belong to the Dalit community, highlighting the deep-rooted caste-based nature of this practice .(LSE Blogs)

Current Status
• Prevalence: As of July 2024, 732 out of 766 districts have reported themselves as manual scavenging-free. (Drishti IAS)
• Health Risks: Manual scavengers often work without protective gear, exposing them to hazardous conditions that can lead to serious health issues, including asphyxiation from toxic gases in septic tanks. (Drishti IAS)
• Social Implications: The practice predominantly affects marginalized communities, reinforcing social stigmas and economic disparities. (Drishti IAS)
Government Initiatives
• NAMASTE Scheme: Launched to eliminate manual scavenging by promoting mechanized sanitation and providing rehabilitation support to affected workers. (Drishti IAS)
• Supreme Court Directives: In January 2025, the Supreme Court ordered a complete ban on manual scavenging in six major metropolitan cities, emphasizing the need for mechanization and worker safety. (India Today)

Systemic Challenges
• Health Hazards: Manual scavengers often work without protective gear, exposing them to toxic substances and life-threatening conditions. The life expectancy for these workers can be as low as 40 years.(The Sun)
• Inadequate Rehabilitation: Despite schemes like the Self Employment Scheme for Rehabilitation of Manual Scavengers (SRMS), only a fraction of identified manual scavengers have received skill development training or financial assistance .(Haqdarshak)
• Poor Implementation of Mechanization: The National Action for Mechanized Sanitation Ecosystem (NAMASTE) aims to eliminate manual scavenging through mechanization. However, its implementation has been inconsistent, with only a portion of the targeted workers being profiled and assisted .(Frontline)

• Enforcement Gaps: Despite existing laws, enforcement remains weak, with instances of manual scavenging still reported in various regions. (ForumIAS)
• Infrastructure Deficiencies: Lack of adequate sewage and drainage systems perpetuates the need for manual cleaning methods. (Drishti IAS)
• Social Stigma: Deep-rooted caste-based discrimination continues to hinder the social reintegration of manual scavengers into more dignified occupations. (Next IAS)


🛠️ Steps Forward
• Enhanced Enforcement: Strict enforcement of existing laws is crucial to prevent the continuation of manual scavenging practices.
• Comprehensive Rehabilitation: Effective rehabilitation programs, including skill development and financial support, must be accessible to all affected individuals.(Drishti IAS)
• Public Awareness: Raising awareness about the plight of manual scavengers can help in reducing stigma and promoting societal integration.
Addressing manual scavenging requires a multifaceted approach that combines

Legal enforcement, social reform, and economic support to eradicate this inhumane practice and restore dignity to those affected.

While strides have been made towards eliminating manual scavenging, sustained efforts in enforcement, infrastructure development, and social reform are essential to fully eradicate this practice and ensure the dignity and safety of all sanitation workers. Manual scavenging persists in India despite being outlawed, revealing a stark contrast between official narratives and the lived realities of many sanitation workers.

Join us a volunteer or intern.

Email: communications@heeals.org

Whatssapp: +91-7982316660

Instagram: @heealsindia

Saturday, 10 May 2025

Ending child marriage and adolescent empowerment


Ending child marriage and adolescent empowerment

Child marriage negatively affects the Indian economy and can lead to an intergenerational cycle of poverty 

Child marriage violates children’s rights and places them at high risk of violence, exploitation, and abuse. Child marriage affects both girls and boys, but it affects girls disproportionately.
It is defined as a marriage of a girl or boy before the age of 18 and refers to both formal marriages and informal unions in which children under the age of 18 live with a partner as if married.     
Child marriage ends childhood.  It negatively influences children’s rights to education, health and protection. These consequences impact not just the girl directly, but also her family and community.
A girl who is married as a child is more likely to be out of school and not earn money and contribute to the community. She is more likely to experience domestic violence and become infected with HIV/AIDS. She is more likely to have children when she is still a child. There are more chances of her dying due to complications during pregnancy and childbirth.
Estimates suggest that each year, at least 1.5 million girls under 18 get married in India. Nearly 16 per cent adolescent girls aged 15-19 are currently married.
While the prevalence of girls getting married before age 18 has declined from 47 per cent to 27 per cent between 2005-2006 and 2015-2016 it is still too high.
The significant progress in the reduction of child marriages in India has contributed to a large extent to the global decrease in the prevalence of the practice. The decline may be the result of multiple factors such as increased literacy of mothers, better access to education for girls, strong legislation and migration from rural areas to urban centres.  Increased rates of girls’ education, proactive government investments in adolescent girls, and strong public messaging around the illegality of child marriage and the harm it causes are also among the reasons for the shift.
Child marriage, a deeply rooted social norm, provides glaring evidence of widespread gender inequality and discrimination. It is the result of the interplay of economic and social forces. In communities where the practice is prevalent, marrying a girl as a child is part of a cluster of social norms and attitudes that reflect the low value accorded to the human rights of girls.
Child marriage negatively affects the Indian economy and can lead to an intergenerational cycle of poverty.    
Girls and boys married as children more likely lack the skills, knowledge and job prospects needed to lift their families out of poverty and contribute to their country’s social and economic growth. Early marriage leads girls to have children earlier and more children over their lifetime, increasing economic burden on the household.  The lack of adequate investments in many countries to end child marriage is likely due in part to the fact that the economic case for ending the practice has not yet been made forcefully.
As a result of norms assigning lower value to girls, as compared to boys, girls are perceived to have no alternative role other than to get married.  And are expected to help with domestic chores and undertake household responsibilities in preparation for their marriage. 
Evidence shows that critical game changers for adolescent girls’ empowerment include postponing marriage beyond the legal ageimproving their health and nutritional status, supporting girls to transition to secondary school, and helping them develop marketable skills so that they can realize their economic potential and transition into healthy, productive and empowered adults.
UNICEF’s approach to ending child marriage in India recognizes the complex nature of the problem, and the socio-cultural and structural factors underpinning the practice. UNICEF India accomplished its ‘scale-up strategy’ to prevent child marriage and increase adolescent empowerment by working with government, partners and relevant stakeholders from the national level down to the district level.  The most significant development has been the gradual shift from interventions that are small in scope and mainly sector-based to large scale district models on adolescent empowerment and reduction of child marriage which rely on existing large government programmes. 
UNICEF and UNFPA have joined forces through a Global Programme to Accelerate Action to End Child Marriage, where for the first time existing strategies in areas such as health, education, child protection, nutrition and water and sanitation have been brought together to address child marriage in a holistic manner. The approach is to address child marriage through the entire lifecycle of a child especially by addressing persisting negative social norms which are key drivers for the high prevalence of child marriage in India. The programme works in partnership with governments, civil society organizations and young people themselves and adopt methods that have proven to work at scale.

At the global level, child marriage is included in Goal 5 “Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls” under Target 5.3 “Eliminate all harmful practices.
Source : UNICEF. 
Email : communications@heeals.org 
Whatssapp: +91- 7982316660
Instagram: @heealsindia
Web : www.heeals.org 

Digital violence is real violence. There is #NoExcuse for online abuse

Violence against women and girls remains one of the most prevalent and pervasive human rights violations in the world. Globally, almost  one...