With around
30% of Indian children attending private institutions, the Indian private
education market is the largest in the world. This is hardly surprising given
the population size but, for a variety of reasons, private schools are
outperforming state run institutions despite recent study showing that the
Government spends, on average, more than twice as much in educating a pupil.
The key factors behind this imbalance are inefficiencies that have become
imbedded in state schooling and efficiencies fee-paying schools have created.
To lift the performance of their own schools issue the Indian government must take
heed of both.
Most serious
among the malpractices commonly associated with India’s free education are the
attacks oneducation standards and teaching practices.Schools are accused not of
completing the syllabi in the school year and the necessary equipment is not
always available. Often much power is bestowed on individual teachers who have
the ability to pass or fail their own pupils while offering extra-curricular
tuition(for a fee). Teacher absenteeism is also rife and the authorities seem
powerless to prevent.Additionally, there are stories of outright corruption
including overcharging and bribes taken to admit or promote a child, or even
issue qualification certificates.
The problems
found in the provision of school infrastructure pose the most direct threat to
a child’s education. A survey in 2013 found that of 780 schools across 13
states 30% were found to have inadequate toilet facilities and 60% had no
playground. Given this it is hardly surprising how unfashionable it has become
to teach in Government schools. Formerly a position of prestige and respect,
teaching is now seen by many graduates as a last-resort career giving rise to a
severe shortage and pushing the student:teacher ratio as high as 70:1 in
extreme cases. The lack of mentorship or access to a professional network as
well as antiquated career progression(often based on seniority rather than
performance) are obvious changes the government must make to buck this trend.
Conversely,
by operating in a private environment;fee-taking schools have learned to
streamline their practices to remain competitive in a diverse market.
Principles have far greater authority over their teachers and employment
contracts include performance and attendance clauses. The teachers themselves
are often less qualified so must strive to hit their targets to guarantee
employment and command less salary, allowing the private schools to reduce
the student: teacher ratios.
India’s
stand out legislation on learning in recent years is the Right to Education Act
(RTE) of 2009. This established free and compulsory education for every child
between the ages of 6 and 14 and guaranteed 25% of places at private schools for
pupils from economically weaker sections of society. The idea was to level the
playing field for poorer students however, sadly this policy has had the effect
of devaluing the education provided in state schools and, thus, exacerbating
the superiority enjoyed by private institutions. Furthermore, the RTE included
no provision for the improvement of the existing Government schools, embedding
the problems outlined above.
However, the
enforcement of this 25% has led to a number of malpractices being adopted by
private schools where unfair financial barriers (high cost of uniforms or add-on
admission and maintenance costs) are placed to prevent poorer students filling
the RTE enabled places. As a result it
has been estimated that across India only 15% of RTE places at fee-paying
schools were filled.
In response
to these issues India’s education department has announced ambitious and far-reaching
reform in two stages; peripheral and core. The first outlined fundamental
infrastructure shortages that have been holding back Government schools and
targeted 8000 new classrooms and 25 new schools are to be opened by the end of
2016 and a recruitment drive to employ 9000 new teachers. The core stage, yet
to formally begin, proposes a radical change in teaching practices including a
decentralisation of authority giving more powers to individual principles,
incentivised contracts, and the creation of School Managers. And then perhaps
most adventurous is the creation of a pilot “super-school” complex of 10
schools each specialising in different areas of education.
All in all
it appears that the government has started to take note of the problems that
have blighted their school system for a generation. Some issues (support for
newly qualified teachers) are easier fixed than others (changing the mind-set
that Government schooling is inferior) and in the meantime the private
education sector will continue to innovate and dominate.
-William Lewis
-Picture-Heeals